Yesterday, I had published a post about the Single Judge’s decision of 9 May, 2014 with respect to the trademark dispute between Anchor and Proctor & Gamble. One of the major issues involved therein was whether the plaintiff’s mark “ALLROUND PROTECTION” was descriptive or not. The Single Judge decided this issue and rightly so, using the principle of approbate and reprobate. However, he did not come to a finding on the descriptiveness of the plaintiff’s mark. I had discussed that...
↧