Continuing from my previous post, this post analyses the Innovatio IP Ventures decision. In the Innovatio case, Judge Holderman modifies some of the concepts in Judge Robart’s decision in Motorola. Hence, the modifications and reasoning thereof are highlighted separately in this post. Both the Motorola, and Innovatio decisions form the basis of my next post in the series. Long post follows. Innovatio IP Ventures: In September 2013, in the third case involving determination of FRAND royalties, Judge Holderman, in n...
↧